Video

Thomas P. Miller Explains What He Heard at the Oral Arguments of King v. Burwell

Although the Supreme Court oral arguments of King v. Burwell mostly went the way people were expecting, there were a few surprises, said Thomas P. Miller, JD, resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, who was able to sit in the courtroom the day of the arguments.

Although the Supreme Court oral arguments of King v. Burwell mostly went the way people were expecting, there were a few surprises, said Thomas P. Miller, JD, resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, who was able to sit in the courtroom the day of the arguments.

At this point, the decision will come down to which side of the arguments Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Anthony Kennedy fall, he said.

"It's always hard to predict from an oral argument, and you get all those ... warnings not to assume what they ask about will ultimately be in their opinion," Mr Miller explained.

Related Videos
Screenshot from interview with Andrew Evens, DO
AJMC Q&A with Jason Bellet, Dr Geoffrey Rutledge, and Dan Nardi
Kimberly Westrich, MA, chief strategy officer at the National Pharmaceutical Council
Sam Peasah, PhD, MBA, RPh, director for the Center of High-Value Health Care at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Jawad Haider Butt, MD, PhD
Laura Bobolts, PharmD, BCOP, senior vice president of clinical strategy and growth at OncoHealth
Barry Byrne, MD, PhD, Powell Gene Therapy Center at the University of Florida
JC Scott, CEO and president, PCMA
Caspian Oliai, MD, MS, a medical oncologist and hematologist and medical director of the UCLA Bone Marrow Transplantation Stem Cell Processing Center
Neha Kashalikar, PharmD, director of strategic pharmacy consulting, MassHealth
Related Content
AJMC Managed Markets Network Logo
CH LogoCenter for Biosimilars Logo