News

Article

Telitacicept Efficacious, Safe in Treating Patients With RA, Inadequate MTX Response

Author(s):

In these phase 3 findings presented at ACR 2023, the safety and efficacy of this drug was proven in American College of Rheumatology-20 (ACR20), ACR50, and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate responses.

This article was originally published in HCPLive®. This version had been lightly edited.

Telitacicept is both effective and safe among individuals with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are shown have to inadequately responded to methotrexate (MTX), according to late-breaking data presented at the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2023 Convergence in San Diego, California.

Doctor Writing on Prescription Pad | image credit: cameravit - stock.adobe.com

Doctor Writing on Prescription Pad | image credit: cameravit - stock.adobe.com

This trial data demonstrated the efficacy of the drug through ACR20, ACR50, and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) responses. Telitacicept is a recombinant fusion protein, which was formulated to target and neutralize B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) and a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL).

The treatment was put under examination in this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study. The investigators sought to look into the impact at a dosage of 160 mg versus the use of a placebo among those with insufficient responses to MTX that had diagnoses of RA.

The study was presented by Qing Zuraw, MD, MPH, MBA, from RemeGen Biosciences in Wayne, Pennsylvania. Zuraw and colleagues used a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study design over 24 weeks.

The investigators later implemented an open-label follow-up to the treatment period which took place from week 25 to 48. Those with moderate-to-severe RA diagnoses who also reported a poor response to receiving MTX were recruited for the study.

These study subjects were randomized by the team into a 3:1 ratio, with the 2 different arms being given either 160 mg of telitacicept or a placebo once-per-week over the course of 24 total weeks. Following the end of the initial 24 week course, the participants who had first been assigned to the placebo arm were switched to telitacicept 160 mg once weekly for a further 24 week course.

The main efficacy end points used by the research team were aimed at the proportion of subjects reporting an ACR20 criteria response at the 24-week mark. The secondary efficacy end points determined by the team included ACR50 and ACR70 response rates, DAS28-ESR, distinct components of the ACR response, and radiographic joint damage, which was assessed by the modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at the 24-week mark.

The investigators ended up recruiting 479 total participants for this research, treating 360 with the drug and 119 with the placebo.

Overall, the team reported that both demographic data and disease qualities were found to be mostly similar between both arms of the study. The exception to these notable similarities was the higher CRP level in those treated with the drug compared to placebo (22.856 mg/L vs 17.287 mg/L, respectively).

A much higher percentage of subjects in the 160 mg treatment arm (60.0%) were shown to have reported an ACR20 response at 24 weeks compared with the placebo arm (26.9%; P < .001).

The participants in the treatment arm were also shown to have a much greater number of subjects achieving ACR50 at 24 weeks, with 21.4% compared with 5.9% in the placebo group (P < .001). The investigators also found that reductions from the point of baseline in DAS28-ESR and individual components of the ACR criteria were shown to be much greater in the treatment arm as opposed to placebo.

Furthermore, a greater number of patients in the 160 mg treatment group were shown not to have radiographic progression at the 24-week mark versus placebo, with 90.2% versus 66.4%, respectively (P < .001).

Furthermore, the investigators noted that there was far less progression of damage to joints in the treatment arm, as measured joint space narrowing score, by mTSS, and by erosion score, from baseline to 24 weeks. Both groups saw comparable scores of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), TEAEs resulting in discontinuation, and infections.

Reference

L. Wang, D. Xu, Q. Zuraw, et al. Telitacicept, a Human Recombinant Fusion Protein Targeting and Neutralizing B Lymphocyte Stimulator (BlyS) and a Proliferation-Inducing Ligand (APRIL), in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients with an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate (MTX): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study. Presented at: American College of Rheumatology Convergence 2023. San Diego, CA. November 10-15, 2023.

Related Videos
Dr Cesar Davila-Chapa
Milind Desai, MD
Masanori Aikawa, MD
Mei Wei, MD, an oncologist specializing in breast cancer at Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah.
Screenshot of an interview with Ruben Mesa, MD
Ruben Mesa, MD
Screenshot of Susan Wescott, RPh, MBA
Screenshot of Stephanie Hsia, PharmD
Screenshot of an interview with Megan Ehret, PharmD
Cesar Davila-Chapa, MD
Related Content
AJMC Managed Markets Network Logo
CH LogoCenter for Biosimilars Logo