While individual interventions have become popular among employers to enhance workplace well-being, a new study shows interventions may have to take place on an organizational level to be effective.
The adoption of individual-level mental well-being interventions in workplaces faces challenges as recent research questions their effectiveness. A new large-scale survey reveals limited evidence supporting practices like mindfulness, resilience training, and stress management, with indications of potential harm.
Although over half of employers have embraced well-being initiatives, the focus on individual-level interventions raises concerns about their legitimacy, prompting a reevaluation of workplace well-being strategies. The study, published in Industrial Relations Journal, advocates for a shift toward organizational interventions and underscores the need for high-quality implementation to foster employee well-being.
Despite a surge in well-being initiatives in the British workplace, the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development reports that the majority of employers have primarily focused on individual-level interventions like counseling and stress management. This has sparked debates about the effectiveness of these interventions compared with organizational changes.
Researchers conducted a comprehensive evaluation of various individual-level mental well-being interventions, including mindfulness and resilience training. Contrary to expectations, the study found no significant differences between participants and nonparticipants in well-being outcomes, work environment measures, organizations, or social groups. This challenges the utility of individual-level interventions in improving workers' well-being and questions their place in policy recommendations, emphasizing the need for further experimental research, according to the study.
In this study, the concept of work well-being is approached holistically, considering individuals' subjective experiences of their working lives, with a particular emphasis on mental well-being. The study targets workplace interventions that promote positive mental health and good psychological functioning, distinguishing them from practices addressing subclinical mental illness, such as employee assistance programs and counseling.
While existing evidence in work psychology literature generally supports the positive impact of individual-level interventions on mental well-being, stress reduction, burnout, and job resource improvement, concerns persist regarding methodological limitations. These include issues like heterogeneity in effects, publication bias, attrition, outcomes, and fidelity.
The study utilized data from the Britain's Healthiest Workplace survey, involving 46,336 individuals from 233 organizations. Propensity score analysis was employed to examine the effects of interventions on individual-level well-being outcomes. Results indicated no significant differences in well-being outcomes between participants and nonparticipants across various interventions. Notably, resilience and stress management interventions showed no benefits, while mindfulness interventions had negative estimates for certain outcomes.
These findings challenge the hypothesis that individual-level interventions significantly improve workers' well-being, except for volunteering initiatives, urging a reconsideration of workplace strategies. The study emphasizes the complexity of evaluating these interventions and calls for more nuanced approaches, considering potential biases, and the findings align with studies suggesting ineffectiveness of low-level interventions without structural changes. Volunteering emerges as a potential positive intervention, suggesting that enhancing social resources may be more effective than focusing on psychological skills.
Acknowledging limitations, including cross-sectional data, the study recommends further research, particularly longitudinal and experimental studies. Although the large sample size allows analysis across diverse organizational contexts, the study highlights the need to consider wider structural contexts and addresses the heterogeneity in intervention practices.
The study recommends a shift away from premature recommendations of individual-level interventions for all workers. Instead, it emphasizes the significance of organizational interventions, aligning with the greater benefits of organizational over individual change. High-quality implementation is highlighted as crucial in fostering employee well-being.
This research prompts a reassessment of workplace well-being strategies, exemplifying the need for more comprehensive approaches and organizational changes, the researchers wrote. The findings contribute to the ongoing discourse on what works in promoting employee well-being, advocating for a combination of approaches to enhance job resources and mitigate job demands.
Reference
Fleming WJ. Employee well‐being outcomes from individual‐level mental health interventions: cross‐sectional evidence from the United Kingdom. Ind Relat J. Published online January 10, 2024. doi: 10.1111/irj.12418
The Joint Commission is launching the Rural Health Clinic Accreditation Program to standardize staff training and patient care practices at rural health clinics nationwide; the American Cancer Society recently launched the largest-ever study of cancer risk and outcomes in Black women; the HHS COVID-19 vaccination campaign saved $732 billion by preventing illness and related costs.
Read More
CMS Medicare Final Rule: Advancing Benefits, Competition, and Consumer Protection
May 7th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with Karen Iapoce, senior director of government products and programs at ZeOmega, about the recent CMS final rule on Medicare Part D and Medicare Advantage.
Listen
Tackling Health Inequality: The Power of Education and Experience
April 30th 2024To help celebrate and recognize National Minority Health Month, we are bringing you a special month-long podcast series with our Strategic Alliance Partner, UPMC Health Plan. Welcome to our final episode of this limited series and our conversation with Janine Jelks-Seale, MSPPM, director of health equity at UPMC Health Plan.
Listen
Access Denied: CMS’ Action Hurts Patients With Cancer in Rural America
May 6th 2024CMS rules hindered the access of rural patients with cancer to medically integrated pharmacies in 2023. The authors discuss the impact on equity in health care, emphasizing the need for regulatory change.
Read More
What Mass General Brigham Is Doing to Combat Prostate Cancer Disparities Among Men of Color
May 5th 2024Quoc-Dien Trinh, MD, MBA, chief of urology at Brigham & Women's Faulkner Hospital, highlighted successful efforts to improve prostate cancer care access for underserved communities in Massachusetts.
Read More