
Opinion|Videos|January 30, 2025
Oral vs IV Iron in Clinical Practice
Panelists discuss how oral iron therapy, although convenient and cost-effective, has significant limitations, including gastrointestinal adverse effects and poor absorption, leading many patients to experience iron intolerance or inadequate response, which often necessitates switching to intravenous iron administration for more reliable and rapid repletion of iron stores.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following:
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of oral versus intravenous (IV) iron therapy in the treatment of IDA?
- Please define oral iron intolerance. What are the potential reasons and subsequent steps for patients with IDA who have had an unsatisfactory response to oral iron therapy?
Newsletter
Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.
Advertisement
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on AJMC
1
House Republicans Block Vote on ACA Subsidy Extension
2
Zasocitinib Hits Phase 3 End Points in Plaque Psoriasis
3
FDA Approval of Subcutaneous Amivantamab Offers Faster, Safer Option for EGFR-Mutated NSCLC
4
Study Suggests Adding BTKi to Chemo May Improve Early Outcomes in Richter Transformation in CLL
5









































