News

Article

Late-Breaking Data Suggest AI Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism Could Be the Future: Dr Zeina Morcos

Author(s):

Key Takeaways

  • Artificial intelligence (AI) models ChatGPT-3.5 and DoximityGPT were evaluated for diagnosing pulmonary embolism, showing alignment with clinical diagnoses.
  • DoximityGPT, tailored for health care, demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy than ChatGPT-3.5, matching clinical diagnoses in 7 out of 10 cases.
SHOW MORE

Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a transformative tool in health care, with the possibility to enhance clinical decision-making and disease management. At the CHEST 2024 annual meeting in Boston, late-breaking data showcased the potential of AI-based systems in diagnosing and managing pulmonary embolism (PE).

The study, presented by Zeina Morcos, MD, an internal medicine resident at Staten Island University Hospital, compared tw2o AI models: ChatGPT-3.5 and DoximityGPT (utilizing GPT-4, tailored for health care applications). The team of investigators aimed to evaluate these models' effectiveness in diagnosing PE against traditional methods, particularly when CT angiography (CTA) results were not immediately available.

"We chose ChatGPT-3.5 and DoximityGPT to assess their ability to diagnose PE using a checklist derived from the Wells score and Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI)," Morcos explained during an interview with The American Journal of Managed Care® (AJMC®). The study involved 10 patients selected from the Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT) at the Staten Island University Hospital.

Key findings from the study revealed that both AI models demonstrated significant alignment with clinical diagnoses made using CTA despite not having access to these imaging results initially. ChatGPT-3.5 matched the clinical diagnosis in 5 out of 10 cases, while DoximityGPT matched in 7 out of 10 cases. The difference, Morcos noted, lies in DoximityGPT's specialization in health care scenarios, potentially enhancing its diagnostic accuracy in clinical settings.

Beyond diagnosis, both AI models provided risk stratification and management recommendations that aligned closely with clinicians' assessments. "Even in cases where the AI models didn't match our initial diagnosis, they offered differential diagnoses that were logical and clinically relevant, such as considering concurrent conditions like COPD exacerbation or myocardial infarction,” Morcos added.

The results underscore AI's evolving role in augmenting clinical decision-making, especially in resource-limited environments or situations requiring immediate assessments. However, Morcos acknowledged concerns about the rapid pace of AI development and its implications for future health care practices.

"As AI continues to advance, integrating seamlessly into our daily practices, we must navigate carefully," she said. "While AI enhances efficiency and accuracy, its integration must be guided by rigorous evaluation and ethical considerations."

These late-breaking data from CHEST 2024 highlight a pivotal step towards leveraging AI for enhanced health care delivery, improved diagnostic precision, and patient care outcomes in the management of conditions like PE. As AI technologies grow in prominence and ability, ongoing research and collaborative efforts will be crucial in harnessing the full potential while ensuring patient safety and clinical efficacy.

Reference

Morcos Z, Achkar M, Grabie Y, Acharya S, Rotblat D. AI revolutionizes PE diagnosis: a comparative analysis of two AI models. CHEST. 2024;166(4):A6362.

Related Videos
Adam Colborn, JD, of AMCP
Corey McEwen, PharmD, MS
Daniel Howell, MBBS
Jonathan Kurman, MD
Tetyana Kendzerska, MD
Krunal Patel, MD
Scott Manaker,MD
Juan Carlos Martinez, MD
Parth Rali, MD
Related Content
AJMC Managed Markets Network Logo
CH LogoCenter for Biosimilars Logo