While expensive hospitals might earn a better reputation, there is little evidence that they provide better care.
While expensive hospitals might earn a better reputation, there is little evidence that they provide better care.
In a study that examined the actual costs of 25,000 insurance claims from hospitals in 10 metropolitan markets, researchers discovered that expensive hospitals were much more likely to win a national ranking for high quality from US News & World Report. However, there was no evidence that they provided better care. In fact, most expensive hospitals actually performed worse than their lower-cost counterparts in areas like meeting performance goals, which include reducing readmissions and avoiding death in surgical patients.
“We found that high-price hospitals within markets were more likely to be engaged in medical education; offer specialized, expensive services typically associated with tertiary-care hospitals; and serve a higher percentage of low-income (and poorly reimbursed) patients,” the study authors wrote “But high-price hospitals also clearly enjoyed dominant market positions. Both their large size and their membership in even larger hospital systems made it difficult for health plans to negotiate lower prices with them.”
While the study authors acknowledged that some of the high costs may be due to specialized treatment offered at these larger hospitals, the study mainly focused on the costs of routine care. Larger hospitals may also treat a larger population of the sickly and poor.
“Given the intense and growing pressure to rein in the growth in private health insurance premiums, the continuation of current trends appears to be unsustainable. It remains to be seen whether or not health plans will somehow regain the upper hand,” the authors said.” If they do not, more radical approaches—such as state-based rate setting or restrictions on contracting arrangements between hospitals and health plans—may gain traction.”
The 10 metropolitan markets examined in study included: Buffalo, Cleveland; Detroit; Flint, Michigan; Indianapolis; Kansas City; St. Louis; Toledo, Ohio; Warren, Michigan; and Youngstown, Ohio.
Around the Web
Expensive Hospitals: Strong Reputations But Little Evidence Of Better Care, Study Finds [Kaiser Health News]
Understanding Differences Between High- And Low-Price Hospitals: Implications For Efforts To Rein In Costs [Health Affairs]
Covering antiobesity medications like semaglutide could save Medicare around $500 million annually; preliminary CDC data showed a 3% decline in the number of US overdose deaths last year; the Biden administration recently announced the first national maternal mental health strategy.
Read More
After the ACA Expanded Health Care Access, 2024 Elections May See Voters Demand Affordability
May 15th 2024At the spring conference of the New Jersey Health Care Quality Institute, speakers discussed how health policy, affordability, and transparency may play a role in voters’ decisions.
Read More
CMS Medicare Final Rule: Advancing Benefits, Competition, and Consumer Protection
May 7th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with Karen Iapoce, senior director of government products and programs at ZeOmega, about the recent CMS final rule on Medicare Part D and Medicare Advantage.
Listen
House lawmakers are expected to advance a contracting ban today on 5 Chinese research firms; US government officials temporarily relaxed strict guidelines on how laboratories handle, store, and transport H5N1 bird flu samples; a recent report found that the number of abortions occurring in the US continued to grow despite bans.
Read More