Cost Issues Related to PD-1 Treatment

An important issue, according to Dr Kolodziej, national medical director of oncology strategy at Aetna, is whether cost could potentially be a barrier for true breakthrough medications such as the PD-1s. During the second segment of a one-on-one interview conducted at the Oncology Stakeholders Summit, Spring 2015 series, he emphasizes the importance of biomarkers to help identify patients who will most benefit from the treatment. Like in hepatitis C, payers want to better understand who is the right patient to treat with high-cost breakthrough drugs and what is the right time to treat. Dr Kolodziej states that the goal with breakthrough therapies is to lower or reduce the barriers that patients face in receiving them.

Dr Feinberg, vice president and chief medical officer at Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions, agrees that although cost is a barrier for every agent, the PD-1 agents’ high efficacy and low toxicity override, to an extent, the cost barrier.

The new CMMI Oncology Care model concerns both Drs Kolodziej and Feinberg in that it does not adequately compensate for expenses incurred when appropriately using innovative products. If a physician prescribes PD-1 treatment, the total cost of care will be higher, and the oncology practice will be disadvantaged. If the CMMI Oncology Care model is based on an episode-of-care or bundled care, breakthrough therapeutics that raise the aggregate cost to the practice will not be preferred. Dr Kolodziej explains that it may take a couple of years to find that savings are not being generated, owing to the high cost of innovative agents, forcing CMMI to adjust the model.