News
Article
Author(s):
The SARAH trial was limited to high-risk patients, which the lead investigator said prevented unnecessary exposure to adverse events in patients less at risk of cardiomyopathy.
A well-known heart failure (HF) drug showed promise for blocking cardiotoxic effects in patients taking anthracycline chemotherapy for cancer, according to results presented today at the 2024 American Heart Association (AHA) Scientific Sessions in Chicago, Illinois.
Patients in a small study who took sacubitril/valsartan, sold as Entresto (Novartis), saw their risk of cardiomyopathy drop 77% compared with those taking placebo. The results led to lead author Marcely G. Bonatto, MD, PhD, of the University of São Paulo in Curitiba, Brazil, calling for steps to identify high-risk patients who might benefit from this approach.
The trial, called SARAH, addressed a longstanding challenge in the care of patients with cancer. Regimens that treat many types of cancer—including breast, stomach, bladder, ovarian, and leukemia—rely anthracyclines such as doxorubicin that are derived from enzyme-killing bacteria that are highly toxic.
The mechanisms of anthracyclines that target DNA in cancer can also cause heart damage, primarily due to the effect on topoisomerase 2β, which has become a focus of research. When this protein, also known as top2β, interacts with anthracyclines, it can lead to the DNA damage that causes cardiomyopathy.
Concern about the long-term effects of anthracyclines on cancer survivors has increased in the past decade, since new classes of therapies have reduced cancer mortality. Newer drugs may be used later in the course of the disease or alongside chemotherapy in a multidrug regimen. At the same time, cancer is being diagnosed in younger adults due to rising obesity rates; these patients often have cancers where anthracyclines remain a mainstay of treatment.
Investigators in SARAH identified patients at high risk of heart failure by measuring troponin levels during anthracycline treatment. Those at the 99th percentile were eligible for the study.
Patients were randomized to receive either sacubitril/valsartan or placebo for 6 months; after starting with a dose of 24 mg or 26 mg twice a day, the doses were titrated up at the 2- and 4-week marks to reach optimal dosing of 97 mg to 103 mg twice a day. Patients were treated with the heart failure drug for 24 weeks. The study group was evaluated for biomarkers, echocardiographic (ECHO) assessments, and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).
Investigators reported that they calculated a sample size of 100 patients using estimated event rates of 35% in the placebo group and 12% in the study drug group, with 80% power and a type I error rate of .05. The primary end point was defined as the incidence of patients showing a greater than 15% reduction in global longitudinal stain (GLS) on the left ventricle after 6 months. Secondary end points included changes in biomarkers, GLS, and left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) after 6 months.
The study was conducted at Erasto Cancer Hospital in Brazil from March 2022 to August 2024. The trial assigned 114 adults with cancer in a randomized fashion (1:1). The participants were undergoing chemotherapy at Erasto Gaertner, a cancer hospital in Curitiba, Brazil. The group was 90% women, with 80.7% being treated for breast cancer, and the mean age was 51.7 years. Of this group, 92% were White, 7% were Black or mixed-race, and 1% were Asian.
SARAH, Bonatto said at a press conference ahead of Monday’s presentation, “is the first study to test sacubitril/valsartan as a protective cardio strategy against anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity, especially in high-risk patients.”
“It's important to note that our strategy selected patients with cellular injury and therefore at high risk of developing cardiotoxicity,” she said. Pinpointing the patients that may benefit from sacubitril/valsartan “helps to avoid unnecessary exposure to adverse events and costs for lower-risk patients.”
Tochi M. Okwuosa, DO, of Rush University in Chicago offered comment on the study, first explaining the separate mechanisms of sacubitril and valsartan. She noted that SARAH evaluated patients by CMR and ECHO, which most studies have not done.
More research is needed, she said.
“We need longer term follow-up in the cardio-oncology population,” Okwuosa said. “The serum trial was just for 6 months. We need comparison between sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan alone. We need hard outcomes like heart failure hospitalizations, cardiovascular and overall mortality. We need real world studies. And then, cost and wide availability is also an issue,” she said.
Strengths of the study include its focus on high-risk patients and the good safety profile, Bonatto said. There were no serious adverse events, she said, and fewer patients in the sacubitril/valsartan group completed the study with cardiac dysfunction. In response to the suggestion about using valsartan alone, Bonatto said in animal studies, sacubitril/valsartan is superior to valsartan alone in preventing damage.
Limitations cited include the study’s small size, single location, and lack of diversity in the patient population.
The AHA sessions conclude today.
Reference
Bonatto M, Ferreira S, Avila M, et al. Effects of sacubitril-valsartan on prevention of cardiotoxicity in high-risk patients undergoing anthracycline chemotherapy: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial – the SARAH trial. Presented at: American Heart Association Scientific Sessions; November 16-18, 2024; Chicago, IL. Abstract 4169654.
Real-World Treatment Sequences and Cost Analysis of cBTKis in CLL
Researchers Characterize Defining Feature of Pediatric AML Subtype