Publication
Article
Evidence-Based Oncology
Author(s):
An interview with Mark Lanasa, MD, PhD, BeiGene senior vice president and chief medical officer for solid tumors, conducted at ASCO 2024.
During the 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, Evidence-Based Oncology (EBO) spoke with Mark Lanasa, MD, PhD, BeiGene senior vice president and chief medical officer for solid tumors. Lanasa discussed findings presented at the meeting regarding tislelizumab, recently approved as Tevimbra in the United States as second-line monotherapy for unresectable or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after prior systemic chemotherapy.1
Separately, Lanasa discussed BeiGene’s partnerships with Zymeworks and Jazz Pharmaceuticals for global development of zanidatamab, which is being studied in a variety of cancers with or without tislelizumab.2
This interview is edited for length and clarity.
EBO: Can you discuss major results being presented at ASCO 2024?
Lanasa: We are presenting a 3-year follow up from our study, RATIONALE-306 (NCT03783442). This study is in frontline, squamous histology esophageal carcinoma, which is a really terrible disease in terms of the prognosis. The patients who have advanced disease are not candidates for either surgery or radiation and have a very dismal prognosis. And they also have very difficult disease-related symptoms, given the anatomic location of the tumor, such as pain and weight loss.
We ran a relatively straightforward phase 3 study where it was standard-of-care chemotherapy with or without tislelizumab, which is our PD-1 inhibitor. This was a global study that enrolled over 600 patients, and in the primary analysis of the dataset,3 we showed a very strong response in terms of the primary end point of overall survival, which we think is the most impactful end point in this disease area. There was almost a 7-month improvement in overall survival, from roughly 10 months to roughly 17 months. That’s the largest incremental improvement that was achieved with a PD-1 inhibitor. We were very excited about those results, and we wanted to share updated survival follow-up to show the durability of the benefit. And indeed, overall survival as well as the secondary end points—progression-free survival and objective response rate—were sustained through a period of follow-up.
EBO: With these new data, what are the next steps?
Lanasa: That dataset has already been approved in China. And we have submitted that dataset in the United States for approval in the first-line setting as well as in Europe and in other markets, given the strength of the overall survival data and the fact that it was a globally conducted research clinical trial. We have a PDUFA [Prescription Drug User Fee Act] date for our submission in July of this year; however, as we disclosed in our earnings,4 the new action date may or may not be met because there’s some uncertainty in terms of FDA’s ability to travel to perform on-site inspections.
EBO: Earlier this year, BeiGene presented positive results for a tislelizumab combination in biliary tract cancer5; gastrointestinal (GI) cancers have seen considerable activity in recent years. What’s happening in this area?
Lanasa: As a broad statement, I am hopeful that for some of these tumor types that have been difficult to treat, we—meaning investigators and sponsors—will have opportunities to move the field forward as we identify better targets. Within biliary duct cancers, specifically those outside the liver and gallbladder, a relatively high proportion of these cancers, [compared with] other tumor types such as breast or gastric cancers, have an amplification of the HER2 gene. And despite the fact that this has been known, there are no approved therapies for HER2-overexpressing or -amplifying biliary disorders.
In collaboration with Zymeworks, and now Jazz Pharmaceuticals, we have executed a single-arm study in later-lying, overexpressing biliary tumors with a drug called zanidatamab. This is a HER2 x HER2 targeting bispecific, so both ends of the bispecific are targeting HER2, but they find different epitopes or have different binding sites on HER2. This is called a biparatopic design. The effect of having these 2 different binding sites is that it’s cross-linking, so [it can] grab 1 HER2 molecule on the cell surface, then grab another HER2 molecule on the cell surface. That has 2 effects: First, it internalizes very effectively, and second, that cross-linking also activates antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity or ADCC.
There have been studies looking at a combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab, which are monoclonal antibodies targeting HER2, and the response rate is teens. But what we saw in the zanidatamab second-line study is that the response rate was slightly over 40%. So these are really strong datasets. And, importantly, the duration was almost a year6 when anticipated survival is much less than a year in second-line cholangiocarcinoma. That is a really great step forward.
Jazz and Zymeworks [have] announced that FDA has granted priority review on that submission in the United States.7 This is a regional alliance where we have rights in China, South Korea, and Australia; Zymeworks and now Jazz have rights in their regions. We also intend to submit those datasets for regulatory approvals in our region. The confirmatory study that has been discussed [will be] a frontline study of the combination of zanidatamab plus PD-1 or a PD-L1 inhibitor [along with] chemotherapy in HER2-overexpressing biliary tumors, to hopefully move that benefit in a later-line setting into the frontline setting when [patients] generally would have a better performance status.
EBO: You are in a number of disease areas that are highly competitive.
Lanasa: That’s by design. Our mission really has 2 parts. Our mission is focused on innovation, that we’re not simply a “me, too” company. I want to be clear about that when we’re talking about our PD-1, because I know there are 7 or 8 approved PD-1s in the United States. There are over 20 approved in China. Our PD-1 was designed to be different. We have an important piece related to innovation, but then we have an equally important piece related to global patient access. The reality, even though that might not be readily apparent here in the United States, is that there are still regions in the world where PD-1s are approved, but there’s not effective market access. We’re committed to addressing both of those problems. And that’s why we think these datasets are important.
Part of the reason why we’re being ambitious is that there is unmet need around the world. Patients do not have access to PD-1 despite the substantial benefit that immunotherapy has brought patients in the tumor types of GI tract, lung cancer, and other tumor types. And the other reason is that we have a very large early portfolio. We see tislelizumab as our foundational molecule that we want to build best-in-class combinations on.
We have 3 areas of focus this year. The first is to take the positive phase 3 studies for tislelizumab and hopefully turn those into global regulatory approvals to achieve our ambition of market access and making PD-1s more broadly available globally. The second is to take our early portfolio, particularly our early immuno-oncology portfolio, things like TIGIT [T cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and ITIM domain], and our HPK1 molecule (which had results at ASCO8), and combine those with tislelizumab to have best-in-class combination regimens. And then the third area of focus is our innovative portfolio. We’re bringing 10 new molecules into the clinic this year. We have a diverse array of modalities and targets: There is a CDK4 selective inhibitor in breast cancer, a pan-KRAS inhibitor for GI and lung cancer; a PRMT5 inhibitor; and our first-in house [antibody-drug conjugates]. So there are lots of different things that are authentically innovative that offer exciting development opportunities to improve outcomes for patients.
References