John Allan, MD

Panelists discuss how comparative data from matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) analyses guide treatment decisions between bispecific therapies and the insights from MAIC results comparing epcoritamab and glofitamab that may influence therapy selection.

Panelists discuss key factors in deciding between monotherapy and combination approaches for bispecific therapies in follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) as well as the potential for combination therapies to be more viable in certain B-cell lymphoma subtypes.

Panelists discuss how the sequencing of bispecific therapies in first-line vs later-line settings should be guided by factors such as disease stage, prior treatments, and patient-specific characteristics to optimize therapeutic outcomes.

Panelists discuss how several studies evaluating bispecific therapies in earlier lines of therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma suggest that patients with high-risk or relapsed/refractory disease are most likely to benefit from these treatments.

Panelists discuss how emerging data on odronextamab in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma suggest its potential to play a significant role in therapy, with promising results that may position it alongside or as a superior option compared with currently approved bispecifics.

Panelists discuss how exciting new data from ASH 2024 on bispecific therapies for B-cell lymphomas, including epcoritamab in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, mosunetuzumab in follicular lymphoma, and odronextamab are shaping treatment algorithms by providing long-term follow-up data that could influence therapeutic strategies and patient management.