-- Days : -- HRS : -- MIN : -- SEC
Register Now →
|Videos|March 2, 2020

Viraj Narayanan Addresses the Adoption Curve Presented by Real-World Data

Education efforts among providers, payer, and patients can help answer the fundamental and important questions raised by the use of real-world data, said Viraj Narayanan, MBA, vice president of Life Sciences at COTA Healthcare.

Education efforts among providers, payer, and patients can help answer the fundamental and important questions raised by the use of real-world data, said Viraj Narayanan, MBA, vice president of Life Sciences at COTA Healthcare.

Transcript:

What is the adoption curve like for using real-world data and how do you get more people comfortable with using real-world data?

The idea of using real world data for regulatory purposes is brand new, and like anything brand new, it should be treated and assessed like that. What we see at COTA is that there's certainly a landscape of sponsors, laggards, those in the middle, and the pioneers. The pioneers are adopting real-world data today and considering how do we actually redesign or consider bringing a clinical trial to the FDA or EMA, differently with real-world data. Those sponsors are using considerations like a single arm trial, and using a comparator cohort with real-world data. For those that are in the middle, or the laggards, a lot of the work that we see that needs to be done is frankly, the education because it's something new. So questions that we hear all the time is why isn't this real-world data the same as my clinical trial data? Why isn't data captured in a reliable format? Why aren't the patients the same? How do we create a matching cohort, from our clinical trial data to the real world data? Is the data going to have the relevant endpoints that we need in our clinical trial relative to the real-world? These are really fundamental, important questions. It's not that for those that aren't adopting, they're not thinking through these questions. I think we just need a lot of education work, frankly, across sponsors, regulators, real-world data companies to help answer those questions. That validation work will really help pave the way for how this data can be used.


Related to this article

Kenneth Komorny, PharmD, BCPS | Image: Moffitt Cancer Center
At a Stakeholder Interchange convened by The American Journal of Managed Care® in Tampa, Florida, an academic-community mix of hematologist-oncologists and pharmacists debated prior authorization, site-of-care payment disparities, and how aggressively to push bispecific antibody regimens to community practices treating patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Andrew D. Zelenetz, MD, PhD, is the chair of the NCCN B-cell Lymphomas panel.  | Image: LinkedIn
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network update on mantle cell lymphoma puts covalent BTK inhibitors, MRD testing, and TP53 sequencing at the center of frontline care, while adding pirtobrutinib and a pair of CAR T-cell therapies for disease that progresses on a BTK inhibitor.